Recently, I've been reading Mullins' compendium work to his Federal Reserve book, The World Order, which cites the newspaper many, many times. While perusing through the pages of the New York Times, I found this article on Irving Kristol, the trotskyite communist who radicalized the Republican Party by introducing the poisonous doctrine of neoconservatism which is nothing new and isn't conservative just as the Federal Reserve isn't federal and has no reserves.
He brought to the Republican Party his rabid dedication to communism with his friend Norman Podhoretz, who both, along with the help of other backstage power-brokers, tranformed the Republican Party into the Trotskyite Wing of the Communist Party.
Ron Paul wrote quite extensively about the neocon agenda in his article Neo-CONNED.
Be aware when reading the article. The NYT and Weekly Standard do try to make Kristol look like an anti-communist anti-socialist. Not true.
Showing posts with label zionism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label zionism. Show all posts
Thursday, October 1, 2009
Friday, September 11, 2009
Former Congressman James Traficant Interviewed by Greta Van Susteren
Jim Traficant was railroaded out of Congress and into prison in 2002 because he was strong minded in his convictions and was too outspoken about what was happening in Washington, D.C.
Tuesday, May 12, 2009
"InfoWarrior" Jason Bermas: Jew Critics Are "Anti-Semites" Who Should Hang Or Electrocute Themselves
Before I begin, I'd like to get something out of the way.
Buzz words like "anti-semite", "anti-semitic", "Jew-hate", "Jew-hater" are terms designed for the political purpose of stifling debate. There has been designed into these terms by educational conditioning a certain negative connotated weight meant to infer or to imply certain associative thoughts that lead the student to politically-desirable conclusions. It serves the purpose well, for when someone starts looking into the Jewish/Zionist angle of the World Order conspiracy the prejudice says that they must be "Holocaust deniers". Of course "Holocaust denier" is also one of those buzz words used as a means to communicate to people that those who question the Holocaust are "anti-Semites" who "hate Jews". David Cole doesn't believe the Holocaust occurred and he's Jewish. Oh, right. Nevermind. He's a "self-hating Jew".
I consider the following minutes a gift to me, provided in the video I posted in this blog post below my commentary. The minutes could not have transpired more beautifully. Jason Bermas proves, without my help, his unreliability as a Truth Seeker. He proves that as a researcher he has a fixed agenda. I would say he's a disinformation agent. If by now no one knows who he is, he's part of the trio team that produced Loose Change.
There's a lot of credible evidence to build the argument that Jews have a significant role to play in determining the political message that is produced out of Hollywood and the contexts of the reports in the corporate news media.
Jason Bermas makes no attempt to prove that the caller who phoned into the show is wrong about these claims. He just says that it's "not a Jewish conspiracy" and that he should "get over it." "Hook-nosed people don't run the world in some kind of cave while they suck the blood out of babies in some weird ritual you believe in."
Jason Bermas throws out the unsubstantiated allegation that the caller or anyone else who happens to agree with the caller believes that all Jews are "hook-nosed people." The well-trained emotional knee-jerk reaction most, if not all, people have to this kind of taboo discussion is to assume that the speaker is of course talking about every single Jew that has lived, is alive, and will be born in the future when no previous quantification existed. The caller did not say "some Jewish people", "most Jewish people", or even "all Jewish people". The caller just happened to say "the Jewish people."
Sweeping generalizations are made benignly about all kinds of groups of people ranging from those people who listen to emo music to those who have sexually active lifestyles and everybody in between. But the tirades only launch when one makes a casual inference - a generalization - about a race, an ethnic group, women, et cetera. It is the imagination of the critics who should be credited with assuming a generalization is pigeon-holing "every single one." Making the statement "gays are into anal sex" does not mean that every gay man likes giving it and/or taking it. And when has there been any conspiracy researcher looking into the Jewish/Zionist angle that believed Jews run the world from a cave? Also, I certainly don't believe every Jew is "hook-nosed". Jason Bermas is certainly not hook-nosed and neither is Dylan Avery.
Next, Bermas goes on to mention that the World Order conspiracy is comprised of participants of all religious backgrounds, all races, and all creeds. But wait a minute. Alex Jones wants us to believe that the World Order is ran by elite white racists who belong to Germanic nazi death cults. Little understood to Alex Jones and his Crew of Jew is that the term Nazi is the compromised derivative of National Socialism and Zionism. The "Na" part of Nazi is National Socialism and the "zi" part of Nazi is "Zionism". This is because Nazism is the combination of two different political philosophies whose students figured out how to benefit greatly by combining their efforts. (ref. Eustace Mullins)
More bizarrely, Webster Tarpley in Jones' latest documentary, The Obama Deception, referred to the World Order conspiracy as primarily an "Anglo-American Empire" when most of the people at the top of the pyramid are Jewish bankers who own the stock of the Bank of England and the Federal Reserve!
Jason's next move is to call for extermination through population control of those who believe that Jews run the world. He erroneously conflates hating Jews to hating all minorities. He then makes the claim that he's somehow not of any particular ethnicity, a biological impossibility if there ever was one!!! In fact, he claims that with a little bit of lighting technique he can be made to look like any ethnicity!!
Bermas's next charge is that the caller is discrediting the "movement" by arguing Jewish domination in the media. What movement? The movement of sheep being deceptively led to the slaughterhouse by Jewish Zionist sheepherders? There's a difference between an InfoWarrior and a Truth Seeker. An InfoWarrior is someone who follows and parrots everything Alex Jones says and a Truth Seeker realizes Alex Jones is a disinformation agent. After all, isn't it a bit strange how the American Broadcasting Company allows Alex Jones to borrow their satellites for his radio show? And besides I'm sure with Jews in such dominant positions at the Genesis Communications Network Alex Jones signed a contract stipulating that he couldn't talk about the Jews.
And I love how these media celebrity conspiracy researchers always act like they're the first ones to uncover it all. They make these cases to become self-appointed leaders in the "truth movement". Eustace Mullins was the first one to write the book exposing the Federal Reserve as a fraud, but Alex Jones and his Crew of Jew promote G. Edward Griffin instead. He tries to discredit this claim but his own credibility evaporates when he turns an about-face and says that he has Jewish friends. Yes, of course, he does. Dylan Avery is one of them. No wonder the Loose Change film never touches upon the Israeli foreknowledge and involvement. They're protecting them!!
By the way, isn't Alex Jones married to a Jew? Violet Jones is not her real name! Her real name is Kelly Rebecca Nichols. Her father is Edward Lowe Nichols and her mother is Sandra Kay Heiligman. But he continues to deny that his wife is Jewish.
In the following video around the 8 minutes mark Alex Jones makes two very conflicting statements.
Statement #1: "My wife's not Jewish."
Statement #2: "In my wife's...you know...zzhh...you know...off on one side of her family they did have some Jewish relatives from Poland..."
Well, which is it, Alex? Is your wife Jewish or not? He goes on to say that it doesn't really matter since he has had the ADL attack him in the past. This really isn't much of an argument since the concept of "controlled opposition" is built on leading the opposition. How many sponsors does Alex Jones have that are Jewish? I would think that would factor in to his reporting. He had Eustace Mullins on his radio program only once and I bet his sponsors threatened to pull their support if he had him on his show again. Alex Jones would've become another Morton Downey, Jr.
But back to the origianl topic at hand here. Bermas then makes the most shocking statement of all. He argues that if you happen to be asking the "Jewish question" you should take a toaster oven, plug it into your bathroom's electrical socket and take a bath with it. Its these oversensitive defense positions that make "antisemites" think that the Jews control the world's resources and want to maintain their control over others with total impunity.
Buzz words like "anti-semite", "anti-semitic", "Jew-hate", "Jew-hater" are terms designed for the political purpose of stifling debate. There has been designed into these terms by educational conditioning a certain negative connotated weight meant to infer or to imply certain associative thoughts that lead the student to politically-desirable conclusions. It serves the purpose well, for when someone starts looking into the Jewish/Zionist angle of the World Order conspiracy the prejudice says that they must be "Holocaust deniers". Of course "Holocaust denier" is also one of those buzz words used as a means to communicate to people that those who question the Holocaust are "anti-Semites" who "hate Jews". David Cole doesn't believe the Holocaust occurred and he's Jewish. Oh, right. Nevermind. He's a "self-hating Jew".
I consider the following minutes a gift to me, provided in the video I posted in this blog post below my commentary. The minutes could not have transpired more beautifully. Jason Bermas proves, without my help, his unreliability as a Truth Seeker. He proves that as a researcher he has a fixed agenda. I would say he's a disinformation agent. If by now no one knows who he is, he's part of the trio team that produced Loose Change.
There's a lot of credible evidence to build the argument that Jews have a significant role to play in determining the political message that is produced out of Hollywood and the contexts of the reports in the corporate news media.
Jason Bermas makes no attempt to prove that the caller who phoned into the show is wrong about these claims. He just says that it's "not a Jewish conspiracy" and that he should "get over it." "Hook-nosed people don't run the world in some kind of cave while they suck the blood out of babies in some weird ritual you believe in."
Jason Bermas throws out the unsubstantiated allegation that the caller or anyone else who happens to agree with the caller believes that all Jews are "hook-nosed people." The well-trained emotional knee-jerk reaction most, if not all, people have to this kind of taboo discussion is to assume that the speaker is of course talking about every single Jew that has lived, is alive, and will be born in the future when no previous quantification existed. The caller did not say "some Jewish people", "most Jewish people", or even "all Jewish people". The caller just happened to say "the Jewish people."
Sweeping generalizations are made benignly about all kinds of groups of people ranging from those people who listen to emo music to those who have sexually active lifestyles and everybody in between. But the tirades only launch when one makes a casual inference - a generalization - about a race, an ethnic group, women, et cetera. It is the imagination of the critics who should be credited with assuming a generalization is pigeon-holing "every single one." Making the statement "gays are into anal sex" does not mean that every gay man likes giving it and/or taking it. And when has there been any conspiracy researcher looking into the Jewish/Zionist angle that believed Jews run the world from a cave? Also, I certainly don't believe every Jew is "hook-nosed". Jason Bermas is certainly not hook-nosed and neither is Dylan Avery.
Next, Bermas goes on to mention that the World Order conspiracy is comprised of participants of all religious backgrounds, all races, and all creeds. But wait a minute. Alex Jones wants us to believe that the World Order is ran by elite white racists who belong to Germanic nazi death cults. Little understood to Alex Jones and his Crew of Jew is that the term Nazi is the compromised derivative of National Socialism and Zionism. The "Na" part of Nazi is National Socialism and the "zi" part of Nazi is "Zionism". This is because Nazism is the combination of two different political philosophies whose students figured out how to benefit greatly by combining their efforts. (ref. Eustace Mullins)
More bizarrely, Webster Tarpley in Jones' latest documentary, The Obama Deception, referred to the World Order conspiracy as primarily an "Anglo-American Empire" when most of the people at the top of the pyramid are Jewish bankers who own the stock of the Bank of England and the Federal Reserve!
Jason's next move is to call for extermination through population control of those who believe that Jews run the world. He erroneously conflates hating Jews to hating all minorities. He then makes the claim that he's somehow not of any particular ethnicity, a biological impossibility if there ever was one!!! In fact, he claims that with a little bit of lighting technique he can be made to look like any ethnicity!!
Bermas's next charge is that the caller is discrediting the "movement" by arguing Jewish domination in the media. What movement? The movement of sheep being deceptively led to the slaughterhouse by Jewish Zionist sheepherders? There's a difference between an InfoWarrior and a Truth Seeker. An InfoWarrior is someone who follows and parrots everything Alex Jones says and a Truth Seeker realizes Alex Jones is a disinformation agent. After all, isn't it a bit strange how the American Broadcasting Company allows Alex Jones to borrow their satellites for his radio show? And besides I'm sure with Jews in such dominant positions at the Genesis Communications Network Alex Jones signed a contract stipulating that he couldn't talk about the Jews.
And I love how these media celebrity conspiracy researchers always act like they're the first ones to uncover it all. They make these cases to become self-appointed leaders in the "truth movement". Eustace Mullins was the first one to write the book exposing the Federal Reserve as a fraud, but Alex Jones and his Crew of Jew promote G. Edward Griffin instead. He tries to discredit this claim but his own credibility evaporates when he turns an about-face and says that he has Jewish friends. Yes, of course, he does. Dylan Avery is one of them. No wonder the Loose Change film never touches upon the Israeli foreknowledge and involvement. They're protecting them!!
By the way, isn't Alex Jones married to a Jew? Violet Jones is not her real name! Her real name is Kelly Rebecca Nichols. Her father is Edward Lowe Nichols and her mother is Sandra Kay Heiligman. But he continues to deny that his wife is Jewish.
In the following video around the 8 minutes mark Alex Jones makes two very conflicting statements.
Statement #1: "My wife's not Jewish."
Statement #2: "In my wife's...you know...zzhh...you know...off on one side of her family they did have some Jewish relatives from Poland..."
Well, which is it, Alex? Is your wife Jewish or not? He goes on to say that it doesn't really matter since he has had the ADL attack him in the past. This really isn't much of an argument since the concept of "controlled opposition" is built on leading the opposition. How many sponsors does Alex Jones have that are Jewish? I would think that would factor in to his reporting. He had Eustace Mullins on his radio program only once and I bet his sponsors threatened to pull their support if he had him on his show again. Alex Jones would've become another Morton Downey, Jr.
But back to the origianl topic at hand here. Bermas then makes the most shocking statement of all. He argues that if you happen to be asking the "Jewish question" you should take a toaster oven, plug it into your bathroom's electrical socket and take a bath with it. Its these oversensitive defense positions that make "antisemites" think that the Jews control the world's resources and want to maintain their control over others with total impunity.
Monday, March 23, 2009
All the King's Aiders and Abetters
Over at RaptureAlert, there's a blog that's been posted which I commented on. You can read the blog post, its called All the King's Men. The author, Mike Mickey, states that he's no conspiracy theorist, but that "I don't think you have to be to have an eyebrow raised". He addresses such topics as the Bilderbergers and global currency in his response to the politico article which I myself will likely address.
I wanted to address his blog post because these subjects are of great interest to me. Christians like Mike Mickey tend to be Zionists: cheerleaders for Israel who believe her establishment in the world scene is part of biblical prophecy and is essential for the return of their Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. These are people that are usually found tacitly approving Israel's mass slaughter of the Palestinian people. To me, a student of conspiracies, World Zionism is just another tentacle of the World Order octopus that must be addressed and exposed for the entire world to see.
This brings me to a message left in the comment section of the blog article. Posted anonymously, the writer states:
Now the First Amendment to the Constitution talks about "freedom of religion" but these people take it to a whole new level. American Christian Zionists revere the Bible above the Constitution, and not in a good way, because for them to act on their belief, the Constitution has to be violated.
Where does the Constitution grant the power to take money from the taxpayer so that the United States Government can send it to Israel in the form of foreign aid? No where! Dumbass!!!
I believe it is treasonous for Americans to participate in the movements of World Zionism and Globalism, just as Senator Joseph McCarthy felt that it was treasonous under Constitutional law to be a practicing communist. And here you have Christian Zionists endorsing traitorous criminality as necessary instruments that will help make conditions right for the return of their Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, as so eloquently expressed in the comment statement made in Mike G. Mickey's posted article, All the King's Men.
It must be their "final solution" to the "Arabic question".
I wanted to address his blog post because these subjects are of great interest to me. Christians like Mike Mickey tend to be Zionists: cheerleaders for Israel who believe her establishment in the world scene is part of biblical prophecy and is essential for the return of their Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. These are people that are usually found tacitly approving Israel's mass slaughter of the Palestinian people. To me, a student of conspiracies, World Zionism is just another tentacle of the World Order octopus that must be addressed and exposed for the entire world to see.
This brings me to a message left in the comment section of the blog article. Posted anonymously, the writer states:
Bible prophecy tells us that a world government, religion, and currency are in this earth's future. These types of people and organizations are necessary for these things to come about. I say, just more signs of the times.This kind of fevered hatred for the freedoms of all people everywhere is abundantly found in the Christian Zionist community. The Christian Zionists blatantly produce more pro-Israel propaganda than even the Zionist Jewish community. In their belief system, the Christian Zionists believe that in order for Jesus Christ to return, all of these prophecies have to be fulfilled: global government, ecumenicalism, one global currency, and an international dictator.
Now the First Amendment to the Constitution talks about "freedom of religion" but these people take it to a whole new level. American Christian Zionists revere the Bible above the Constitution, and not in a good way, because for them to act on their belief, the Constitution has to be violated.
Where does the Constitution grant the power to take money from the taxpayer so that the United States Government can send it to Israel in the form of foreign aid? No where! Dumbass!!!
I believe it is treasonous for Americans to participate in the movements of World Zionism and Globalism, just as Senator Joseph McCarthy felt that it was treasonous under Constitutional law to be a practicing communist. And here you have Christian Zionists endorsing traitorous criminality as necessary instruments that will help make conditions right for the return of their Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, as so eloquently expressed in the comment statement made in Mike G. Mickey's posted article, All the King's Men.
It must be their "final solution" to the "Arabic question".
Friday, January 23, 2009
The ADL: Evil, courrupt, dishonest, pernicious, portentous, threatening, inauspicious, harmful, and a whole load of synonyms for a load of bullshit
Fuck the Anti-defamation League!
I found this compendiary documentary on YouTube not to long ago and I felt it was on target and well worth the time to post it here. It's in line with most of the research that myself and some of the other bloggers here at MercuryToona (mainly MisterGoldbug) have done on the ADL.
I would like to take a moment to affirm that nor myself or anyone else here at MercuryToona are racists or anti-semetic. We're honsest truth-seekers and as we've come to realize, the truth is ugly.
The ADL is nothing more than a smokescreen to domino the flagitigious, Zionist actions of the Israel Lobby and it's constituents. Zionism in of itself is a racist ideology. You can learn more about it here.
I urge you to do the reseach and see the information for yourself and form your own opinions on the matter.
I found this compendiary documentary on YouTube not to long ago and I felt it was on target and well worth the time to post it here. It's in line with most of the research that myself and some of the other bloggers here at MercuryToona (mainly MisterGoldbug) have done on the ADL.
I would like to take a moment to affirm that nor myself or anyone else here at MercuryToona are racists or anti-semetic. We're honsest truth-seekers and as we've come to realize, the truth is ugly.
The ADL is nothing more than a smokescreen to domino the flagitigious, Zionist actions of the Israel Lobby and it's constituents. Zionism in of itself is a racist ideology. You can learn more about it here.
I urge you to do the reseach and see the information for yourself and form your own opinions on the matter.
Monday, January 19, 2009
Rabbi Yisroel Weiss
Rabbi Yisroel Weiss of Jews United Against Zionism, in an interview on Fox News. It was posted on YouTube August 4, 2006. This video further addresses some of the issues mentioned here on MercuryToona concerning Zionism and the illegal state of Israel, this time from the perspetive of an orthodox Jew
Tuesday, January 13, 2009
Eustace Mullins on the Fed
I realize there are many posts here on MercuryToona concerning the Federal Reserve, its functions and implications, but the other contraptionists including myself, feel that it is absolutely necessary to do so since its operations lay in obscurity in the minds of most Americans.
Here, Eustace Mullins elaborates further on the subject.
Here, Eustace Mullins elaborates further on the subject.
Monday, January 12, 2009
One of my favorites
At least one person in Congress is bucking the trend to blindly support the murderous over reaction in Gaza by Israel. Dennis Kucinich has his head on a bit more squarely than most in this regard.
"In Gaza, the United Nations gave the Israeli army the coordinates of a U.N. school, and the school was then hit by Israeli tank fire, killing about 40. The U.N. put flags on emergency vehicles, coordinating the movements of those vehicles with the Israeli military, and the vehicles came under attack, killing emergency workers. The Israeli army evacuated 100 Palestinians to shelter, and then bombed the shelter, killing 30 people.
Found, again, on Alternet."Emergency workers have been blocked by the Israeli army from reaching hundreds of injured persons. Today's Washington Post (reports): '100 survivors rescued in Gaza from roads blocked from Israelis. Relief agencies fear more are trapped, days after neighborhood was shelled.' Today, the U.S. Congress is going to be asked to pass a resolution supporting Israel's actions in Gaza. I'm hopeful that we don't support the inhumanity that has been repeatedly expressed by the Israeli army. The U.S. abstained from a U.N. call for a cease-fire. We must take a new direction in the Middle East, and that new direction must be mindful of the inhumane conditions in Gaza."
Boycott Israel
Some good stuff at Alternet today. Naomi Klein has a piece up that makes the argument that similar tactics used to defeat apartheid in South Africa could be used against Israel to curb the violence against Palestinians. I don't really know if that is possible, but it sounds better than doing nothing. Israel seems pretty committed to increasing violence against Palestinians lately. I'm not sure monetary punishments would sway the Israeli leadership on this, and it's not like it would be some sort of official sanctions against Israel, that will never happen, through the UN at least. The US will continue to support her right to defend herself( I like the way that's always phrased, in the feminine, so as to reinforce that fact that 'she' is never the aggressor and only defending 'herself', such bullshit psycho propaganda) to the very end, with weapons and money if need be. So from this point onward, I'll continue to never buy kosher products, except maybe pickles, but only if they are on sale. If I actually had money and investments I would consider divestment as well.
Monday, January 5, 2009
Nazi Israel: "Hamas Hit Us First" Lie.
The Israeli government should build a statue to Hitler, the size of which should be comparable to the one that was built for Saddam Hussein. After all, it is the Zionists who have Adolf Hitler to thank for Israel's existence today, for without the Hitler Administration there would be no Israel.
But they're not going to do that.
The recent events that transpired in Gaza are not shocking. Israel has been talking about invading Gaza for some time now. But it's interesting how the mainstream media of both Israel and America are reporting the story. Gordon Johndoe, spokesman for the National Security Council, called the actions of Hamas-controlled Gaza "completely unacceptable." In reference to the allegation that Gaza attacked Israel, provoking Israel into a military response, Johndoe describes the allegedly guilty Gazans as follows: "These people are nothing but thugs, so Israel is going to defend its people against terrorists like Hamas that indiscriminately kill their own people."
The following article reprinted here for this blog was written by Charles E. Carlson. For purposes of being terse, the author of this blog is only posting what he feels is the relevant parts. The link to the article is provided below.
Israel cannot kill all three or four million Palestinians, although it has been officially considered. And, Likud politicians will do it if they can. Past Prime Minister Ariel Sharon actually stated he was capable and willing to kill all Palestinian Arabs if the Zionists could handle the world heat it would generate. Israel’s objective, instead, is to eliminate Hamas, so they can once again control the Palestinians, as they have in the past, by controlling its leaders.
Israel with the help of the USA, trained Yassar Arafat to be its kind of Arab leader and helped him to become a billionaire. In exchange Arafat created a terrorist image for his peace-seeking people, but he never attacked Israeli political figures, as he would have done if he was their enemy.
On the first day of 2009 Israel bombed a 4 story apartment building in Gaza to kill one Hamas leader. They were willing to kill eight members of his family, all women and children, plus four more non-family members who lived in the same building! The USA networks did not report the event. And, the US Administration supports these Zionist acts of terrorism, as the President’s press release indicates. Unfortunately many Americans, especially evangelical Christians, choose to believe him.
Those who have been inside Gaza know Israel struck first, and Hamas’s response is only a token for lack of serious armaments. On December 29, 2008, on CNN, A united Nations official in Gaza, an English woman named Karen, stated she has lived in Gaza for six years, and whose job it is to organize distribution of UN purchased food. She set a Zionist friendly reporter straight. His loaded question was, “do the Gazans know that only Hamas is to blame for their sufferings?”
Answering from her office in Gaza, Karen, the UN official, stated that her assistant, a Gazan, was killed that very day by an Israeli bomb while doing his job delivering food, and that it was Israel, not Hamas, who broke the six-month peace truce by keeping the border entrances sealed for months after the “truce” began.
She put the reporter in his place about who bombed first, noting she was in Gaza under attack several hours before Hamas retaliated with some sixty homemade rockets. She affirmed that Israel has destroyed Gaza hospitals, mosques, schools, police stations, and private homes, all based on the excuse of one lone homemade rocket the week before that hit no one, and did no damage. Our leaders know all this but the truth does not further their agenda. The “Hamas hit us first” lie does.
Israelis often refer to Palestinians as “animals” in private conversation. Israel’s military started the slaughter by starving the Gazans in hopes the victims would blame and reject Hamas. When this did not work Israel trumped up a homemade, one rocket excuse to start bombing the Gaza City, and is still trying to blame Hamas. In summary, there are a few simple truths that Israel cannot stand, and that US politicians and the press never recognize.
1. Hamas is the lawfully elected government of Gaza and the West Bank as well. It still has the respect of the people. It not only has the right to lead but has the responsibility, which Hamas recognizes.
2. Israeli and American officials lie about Hamas routinely, it’s strictly business to lie, and they are not ashamed when they are caught. A recent official Israeli statement claimed “Hamas came to power in a bloody coup.” In fact, the Palestinian election was supervised and certified to be fair and free by an international team lead by a former US President, James Earle Carter.
3. Gazans do not train their children to be suicide bombers anymore than Americans do; “Human Bombs” are the product of lost dreams and the frustrations of 40 years of occupation. Some children who grow up without hope become dangerous adults. Anyone who goes to Gaza, as I did, will learn they are not trained to hate us, nor to carry bombs. They learn to hate by being bombed.
4. Gaza children are considered a blessing. Most families have lots of them and half the population is sixteen or under. As an example, abortion is practically unknown in Gaza; but in Israel it is a government provided utility. It is fair to say the Gazans practice a life culture; Israelis practice a death culture.
5. Gazans co-exist side by side, race and religion, Muslim and Christian, church beside mosque. Their Children often go to the same school, Hamas and Muslim kids with Catholic, Orthodox, and a few Baptists, until Israel bombs the school with US weapons. I have seen it and talked to the parents. A massive USA/Israeli propaganda campaign has the objective of convincing Christians that Muslims hate them.
http://whtt.org/index.php?news=2&id=2770
No doubt subscribers of the international state religion known as Zionism will spin this story through misrepresentation to successfully convince people this story is just another antisemitic conspiracy theory peddled by crackpots who should be living in mental institutions.
But they're not going to do that.
The recent events that transpired in Gaza are not shocking. Israel has been talking about invading Gaza for some time now. But it's interesting how the mainstream media of both Israel and America are reporting the story. Gordon Johndoe, spokesman for the National Security Council, called the actions of Hamas-controlled Gaza "completely unacceptable." In reference to the allegation that Gaza attacked Israel, provoking Israel into a military response, Johndoe describes the allegedly guilty Gazans as follows: "These people are nothing but thugs, so Israel is going to defend its people against terrorists like Hamas that indiscriminately kill their own people."
The following article reprinted here for this blog was written by Charles E. Carlson. For purposes of being terse, the author of this blog is only posting what he feels is the relevant parts. The link to the article is provided below.
Israel cannot kill all three or four million Palestinians, although it has been officially considered. And, Likud politicians will do it if they can. Past Prime Minister Ariel Sharon actually stated he was capable and willing to kill all Palestinian Arabs if the Zionists could handle the world heat it would generate. Israel’s objective, instead, is to eliminate Hamas, so they can once again control the Palestinians, as they have in the past, by controlling its leaders.
Israel with the help of the USA, trained Yassar Arafat to be its kind of Arab leader and helped him to become a billionaire. In exchange Arafat created a terrorist image for his peace-seeking people, but he never attacked Israeli political figures, as he would have done if he was their enemy.
On the first day of 2009 Israel bombed a 4 story apartment building in Gaza to kill one Hamas leader. They were willing to kill eight members of his family, all women and children, plus four more non-family members who lived in the same building! The USA networks did not report the event. And, the US Administration supports these Zionist acts of terrorism, as the President’s press release indicates. Unfortunately many Americans, especially evangelical Christians, choose to believe him.
Those who have been inside Gaza know Israel struck first, and Hamas’s response is only a token for lack of serious armaments. On December 29, 2008, on CNN, A united Nations official in Gaza, an English woman named Karen, stated she has lived in Gaza for six years, and whose job it is to organize distribution of UN purchased food. She set a Zionist friendly reporter straight. His loaded question was, “do the Gazans know that only Hamas is to blame for their sufferings?”
Answering from her office in Gaza, Karen, the UN official, stated that her assistant, a Gazan, was killed that very day by an Israeli bomb while doing his job delivering food, and that it was Israel, not Hamas, who broke the six-month peace truce by keeping the border entrances sealed for months after the “truce” began.
She put the reporter in his place about who bombed first, noting she was in Gaza under attack several hours before Hamas retaliated with some sixty homemade rockets. She affirmed that Israel has destroyed Gaza hospitals, mosques, schools, police stations, and private homes, all based on the excuse of one lone homemade rocket the week before that hit no one, and did no damage. Our leaders know all this but the truth does not further their agenda. The “Hamas hit us first” lie does.
Israelis often refer to Palestinians as “animals” in private conversation. Israel’s military started the slaughter by starving the Gazans in hopes the victims would blame and reject Hamas. When this did not work Israel trumped up a homemade, one rocket excuse to start bombing the Gaza City, and is still trying to blame Hamas. In summary, there are a few simple truths that Israel cannot stand, and that US politicians and the press never recognize.
1. Hamas is the lawfully elected government of Gaza and the West Bank as well. It still has the respect of the people. It not only has the right to lead but has the responsibility, which Hamas recognizes.
2. Israeli and American officials lie about Hamas routinely, it’s strictly business to lie, and they are not ashamed when they are caught. A recent official Israeli statement claimed “Hamas came to power in a bloody coup.” In fact, the Palestinian election was supervised and certified to be fair and free by an international team lead by a former US President, James Earle Carter.
3. Gazans do not train their children to be suicide bombers anymore than Americans do; “Human Bombs” are the product of lost dreams and the frustrations of 40 years of occupation. Some children who grow up without hope become dangerous adults. Anyone who goes to Gaza, as I did, will learn they are not trained to hate us, nor to carry bombs. They learn to hate by being bombed.
4. Gaza children are considered a blessing. Most families have lots of them and half the population is sixteen or under. As an example, abortion is practically unknown in Gaza; but in Israel it is a government provided utility. It is fair to say the Gazans practice a life culture; Israelis practice a death culture.
5. Gazans co-exist side by side, race and religion, Muslim and Christian, church beside mosque. Their Children often go to the same school, Hamas and Muslim kids with Catholic, Orthodox, and a few Baptists, until Israel bombs the school with US weapons. I have seen it and talked to the parents. A massive USA/Israeli propaganda campaign has the objective of convincing Christians that Muslims hate them.
http://whtt.org/index.php?news=2&id=2770
No doubt subscribers of the international state religion known as Zionism will spin this story through misrepresentation to successfully convince people this story is just another antisemitic conspiracy theory peddled by crackpots who should be living in mental institutions.
Wednesday, December 17, 2008
Crimes Against Humanity: Israel
I came upon this article by Chris Hedges on Alternet, on the ongoing atrocities of Israel against the Palestinians living in the Gaza strip. I've decided to post it here in its entirety.
Israel's 'Crime Against Humanity'
by Chris Hedges
Israel’s siege of Gaza, largely unseen by the outside world because of Jerusalem’s refusal to allow humanitarian aid workers, reporters and photographers access to Gaza, rivals the most egregious crimes carried out at the height of apartheid by the South African regime. It comes close to the horrors visited on Sarajevo by the Bosnian Serbs. It has disturbing echoes of the Nazi ghettos of Lodz and Warsaw.
“This is a stain on what is left of Israeli morality,” I was told by Richard N. Veits, the former U.S. ambassador to Jordan who led a delegation from the Council on Foreign Relations to Gaza to meet Hamas leaders this past summer. “I am almost breathless discussing this subject. It is so myopic. Washington, of course, is a handmaiden to all this. The Israeli manipulation of a population in this manner is comparable to some of the crimes that took place against civilian populations fifty years ago.”
The U.N. special rapporteur for human rights in the occupied Palestinian territory, former Princeton University law professor Richard Falk, calls what Israel is doing to the 1.5 million Palestinians in Gaza “a crime against humanity.” Falk, who is Jewish, has condemned the collective punishment of the Palestinians in Gaza as “a flagrant and massive violation of international humanitarian law as laid down in Article 33 of the Fourth Geneva Convention.” He has asked for “the International Criminal Court to investigate the situation, and determine whether the Israeli civilian leaders and military commanders responsible for the Gaza siege should be indicted and prosecuted for violations of international criminal law.”
Falk, while condemning the rocket attacks by the militant group Hamas, which he points out are also criminal violations of international law, goes on to say that “such Palestinian behavior does not legalize Israel’s imposition of a collective punishment of a life- and health-threatening character on the people of Gaza, and should not distract the U.N. or international society from discharging their fundamental moral and legal duty to render protection to the Palestinian people.”
“It is an unfolding humanitarian catastrophe that each day poses the entire 1.5 million Gazans to an unspeakable ordeal, to a struggle to survive in terms of their health,” Falk said when I reached him by phone in California shortly before he left for Israel. “This is an increasingly precarious condition. A recent study reports that 46 percent of all Gazan children suffer from acute anemia. There are reports that the sonic booms associated with Israeli overflights have caused widespread deafness, especially among children. Gazan children need thousands of hearing aids. Malnutrition is extremely high in a number of different dimensions and affects 75 percent of Gazans. There are widespread mental disorders, especially among young people without the will to live. Over 50 percent of Gazan children under the age of 12 have been found to have no will to live.”
Gaza now spends 12 hours a day without power, which can be a death sentence to the severely ill in hospitals. There are few drugs and little medicine, including no cancer or cystic fibrosis medication. Hospitals have generators but often lack fuel. Medical equipment, including one of Gaza’s three CT scanners, has been destroyed by power surges and fluctuations. Medical staff cannot control the temperature of incubators for newborns. And Israel has revoked most exit visas, meaning some of those who need specialized care, including cancer patients and those in need of kidney dialysis, have died. Of the 230 Gazans estimated to have died last year because they were denied proper medical care, several spent their final hours at Israeli crossing points where they were refused entry into Israel. The statistics gathered on children—half of Gaza’s population is under the age of 17—are increasingly grim. About 45 percent of children in Gaza have iron deficiency from a lack of fruit and vegetables, and 18 percent have stunted growth.
“It is macabre,” Falk said. “I don’t know of anything that exactly fits this situation. People have been referring to the Warsaw ghetto as the nearest analog in modern times.”
“There is no structure of an occupation that endured for decades and involved this kind of oppressive circumstances,” the rapporteur added. “The magnitude, the deliberateness, the violations of international humanitarian law, the impact on the health, lives and survival and the overall conditions warrant the characterization of a crime against humanity. This occupation is the direct intention by the Israeli military and civilian authorities. They are responsible and should be held accountable.”
The point of this Israeli siege, ostensibly, is to break Hamas, the radical Islamic group that was elected to power in 2007. But Hamas has repeatedly proposed long-term truces with Israel and offered to negotiate a permanent truce. During the last cease-fire, established through Egyptian intermediaries in July, Hamas upheld the truce although Israel refused to ease the blockade. It was Israel that, on Nov. 4, initiated an armed attack that violated the truce and killed six Palestinians. It was only then that Hamas resumed firing rockets at Israel. Palestinians have launched more than 200 rockets on Israel since the latest round of violence began. There have been no Israeli casualties.
“This is a crime of survival,” Falk said of the rocket attacks. “Israel has put the Gazans in a set of circumstances where they either have to accept whatever is imposed on them or resist in any way available to them. That is a horrible dilemma to impose upon a people. This does not alleviate the Palestinians, and Gazans in particular, for accountability for doing these acts involving rocket fire, but it also imposes some responsibility on Israel for creating these circumstances.”
Israel seeks to break the will of the Palestinians to resist. The Israeli government has demonstrated little interest in diplomacy or a peaceful solution. The rapid expansion of Jewish settlements on the West Bank is an effort to thwart the possibility of a two-state solution by gobbling up vast tracts of Palestinian real estate. Israel also appears to want to thrust the impoverished Gaza Strip onto Egypt. There are now dozens of tunnels, the principal means for food and goods, connecting Gaza to Egypt. Israel permits the tunnels to operate, most likely as part of an effort to further cut Gaza off from Israel.
“Israel, all along, has not been prepared to enter into diplomatic process that gives the Palestinians a viable state,” Falk said. “They [the Israelis] feel time is on their side. They feel they can create enough facts on the ground so people will come to the conclusion a viable state cannot emerge.”
The use of terror and hunger to break a hostile population is one of the oldest forms of warfare. I watched the Bosnian Serbs employ the same tactic in Sarajevo. Those who orchestrate such sieges do not grasp the terrible rage born of long humiliation, indiscriminate violence and abuse. A father or a mother whose child dies because of a lack of vaccines or proper medical care does not forget. A boy whose ill grandmother dies while detained at an Israel checkpoint does not forget. All who endure humiliation, abuse and the murder of family members do not forget. This rage becomes a virus within those who, eventually, stumble out into the daylight. Is it any wonder that 71 percent of children interviewed at a school in Gaza recently said they wanted to be a “martyr”?
The Israelis in Gaza, like the American forces in Iraq and Afghanistan, are foolishly breeding the next generation of militants and Islamic radicals. Jihadists, enraged by the injustices done by Israel and the United States, seek to carry out reciprocal acts of savagery, even at the cost of their own lives. The violence unleashed on Palestinian children will, one day, be the violence unleashed on Israeli children. This is the tragedy of Gaza. This is the tragedy of Israel.
Tuesday, December 9, 2008
Chomsky on the ADL (Anti-Defamation Leauge)
An excerpt from Noam Chomsky's 1989 book Necessary Illusions.
"The ADL has virtually abandoned its earlier role as a civil rights organization, becoming 'one of the main pillars' of Israeli propaganda in the U.S.… These efforts, buttressed by insinuations of anti-Semitism or direct accusations, are intended to deflect or undermine opposition to Israeli policies, including Israel's refusal, with U.S. support, to move towards a general political settlement."
More to come on this issue.
Wednesday, November 19, 2008
Mike G. Mickey and Rapture Alert
I've been wanting to post about this subject for a while now. This has been a subject of interest and considerable irritation to me. Call it a pet peeve of mine. Or perhaps a major psychotic hatred. It could be that its just had too long a time to fester.
Anyway, let's lance this boil. His name is Mike G. Mickey and he hosts and manages a website called Rapture Alert: Sounding the Alert that Jesus Christ is Coming Soon!. Why is he the target of my contention? A few years ago while I was working at my previous job I met a co-worker who had come across this person online and wanted me to know about this website owner. I had just learned about the Federal Reserve and its purpose. She explained to me that he charts the prophecy of revelation through news outlets, and uses this as his argument that Christ's time is drawing near. At the time of this discovery of mine, I had never heard of the Second Coming of Jesus Christ. Anyway, Mike's objective is to reach as many people as possible about the story of Jesus Christ and His offer of eternal salvation. Ok, I don't mind this opinion. Believing in a superior intelligence on a personal level is fine with me. And we're certainly closer to the End than we have ever been before. But as the progression of email exchanges continued between us, I found him to be a stubborn, opinionated neoconservative. And I'm sure he came to the conclusion that I was a godless heathen.
This is how I learned about pre- and post-millenialism, dispensationalism, and the violent and literal interpretation of the Book of Revelations. In summary, what Mike G. Mickey over at Rapture Alert proposes is that for Jesus Christ to return, there has to be geopolitical support for the establishment of Israel and the maintaining of Israel in all that this racist Marxist terrorist state does. Of course, what he believes, as do so many other brainwashed lemmings, is that if you criticize Israel or her existence, you've just committed the unforgiveable sin of antiSemitism, whatever that means.
There is a different opinion however, and this is of Orthodox Jewry, the belief that there can be no Jewish kingdom on earth until the coming messiah. Since the Jews haven't accepted Jesus Christ as their messiah, no Jewish kingdom allowed. How does the Christian community in America reconcile this difference? They completely forget about it.
While investigating the site, I found this article he wrote on Secret Societies. He lists the Federal Reserve as being one of them but very few articles register under the search term Ron Paul, the sole voice in Congress dissenting against such a sinful organization. Christians, such as Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson, Hal Lindsay, and John Hagee, are always expressing God's damnation against America. If there is any truth to this is at all, maybe the existence of the Federal Reserve is among the numbered reasons God is damning America. You'd think that being aware of this simple little fact, a Christian like Mike G. Mickey would've supported someone like Ron Paul for President, but it is because of his misinterpretation of Christianity that prevents his support. After all, and maybe someone should tell Mickey, it wouldn't have been achievable to establish Israel without a fractional-reserve bank like the Fed to float the capital it needed.
But I'm assuming this man is a Christian. This man isn't Christian at all. Instead he is what the scriptures refer to as a false prophet. Christians are usually altruistic. I've met them, I know this, but this current breed is nothing of the kind because true Christians believing the Book of Revelations would protest the facilitation of global government at all costs, sparing no expense, risking life and limb to halt its production.
Not only is this current breed misinterpreting Christianity in this respect, they may also very well be pushing people away from the Gospel of Jesus Christ, which the bible says Hell reserves for such special transgressions.
In one of our last exchanges, Mike told me that the only one I could trust was Jesus Christ. So I asked him then if this meant that I couldn't even trust my very own mother, the woman who gave birth to me. He replied that I couldn't even trust her. Mike G. Mickey says that he is a retired police officer. I wonder then if he's a plant. I guess I shouldn't be trusting what he says either.
Anyway, let's lance this boil. His name is Mike G. Mickey and he hosts and manages a website called Rapture Alert: Sounding the Alert that Jesus Christ is Coming Soon!. Why is he the target of my contention? A few years ago while I was working at my previous job I met a co-worker who had come across this person online and wanted me to know about this website owner. I had just learned about the Federal Reserve and its purpose. She explained to me that he charts the prophecy of revelation through news outlets, and uses this as his argument that Christ's time is drawing near. At the time of this discovery of mine, I had never heard of the Second Coming of Jesus Christ. Anyway, Mike's objective is to reach as many people as possible about the story of Jesus Christ and His offer of eternal salvation. Ok, I don't mind this opinion. Believing in a superior intelligence on a personal level is fine with me. And we're certainly closer to the End than we have ever been before. But as the progression of email exchanges continued between us, I found him to be a stubborn, opinionated neoconservative. And I'm sure he came to the conclusion that I was a godless heathen.
This is how I learned about pre- and post-millenialism, dispensationalism, and the violent and literal interpretation of the Book of Revelations. In summary, what Mike G. Mickey over at Rapture Alert proposes is that for Jesus Christ to return, there has to be geopolitical support for the establishment of Israel and the maintaining of Israel in all that this racist Marxist terrorist state does. Of course, what he believes, as do so many other brainwashed lemmings, is that if you criticize Israel or her existence, you've just committed the unforgiveable sin of antiSemitism, whatever that means.
There is a different opinion however, and this is of Orthodox Jewry, the belief that there can be no Jewish kingdom on earth until the coming messiah. Since the Jews haven't accepted Jesus Christ as their messiah, no Jewish kingdom allowed. How does the Christian community in America reconcile this difference? They completely forget about it.
While investigating the site, I found this article he wrote on Secret Societies. He lists the Federal Reserve as being one of them but very few articles register under the search term Ron Paul, the sole voice in Congress dissenting against such a sinful organization. Christians, such as Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson, Hal Lindsay, and John Hagee, are always expressing God's damnation against America. If there is any truth to this is at all, maybe the existence of the Federal Reserve is among the numbered reasons God is damning America. You'd think that being aware of this simple little fact, a Christian like Mike G. Mickey would've supported someone like Ron Paul for President, but it is because of his misinterpretation of Christianity that prevents his support. After all, and maybe someone should tell Mickey, it wouldn't have been achievable to establish Israel without a fractional-reserve bank like the Fed to float the capital it needed.
But I'm assuming this man is a Christian. This man isn't Christian at all. Instead he is what the scriptures refer to as a false prophet. Christians are usually altruistic. I've met them, I know this, but this current breed is nothing of the kind because true Christians believing the Book of Revelations would protest the facilitation of global government at all costs, sparing no expense, risking life and limb to halt its production.
Not only is this current breed misinterpreting Christianity in this respect, they may also very well be pushing people away from the Gospel of Jesus Christ, which the bible says Hell reserves for such special transgressions.
In one of our last exchanges, Mike told me that the only one I could trust was Jesus Christ. So I asked him then if this meant that I couldn't even trust my very own mother, the woman who gave birth to me. He replied that I couldn't even trust her. Mike G. Mickey says that he is a retired police officer. I wonder then if he's a plant. I guess I shouldn't be trusting what he says either.
Tuesday, November 18, 2008
Howard Zinn and Noam Chomsky Deny 9/11 Truth
Revelations are coming out from the Alex Jones website, InfoWars, that Howard Zinn has stated very clearly that he doesn't care whether or not the WTC buildings were blown up or not. I'd like to make myself clear regarding these "conspiracy theories" about 9/11, as I am a guest contributor here to this blogsite, and I don't know how many of Shane's friends agree with me or not.
I think that 9/11 wasn't what the government told us it was, but I do tend to take the more extreme position -- this is to say, extreme according to mainstream American views -- that the Israeli Jewish Zionists are complicit in the crimes of that day. But what happens so many times over in these kinds of discussions is that the sections of debate discredited by the opposing party tend to end up being the most passionate arguments of those who argue for it, whether it be the JFK Assassination or Pearl Harbor. And it is the demolition arguments that become the focal point and source of origin for the 9/11 debates. Regardless of who is right in the debate on demolition, 9/11 was still a criminal conspiracy involving elected officials of high office in both America and Israel.
I try not to involve myself with the arguments supporting the demolition theory because I'm no physics and demolition expert and what happens so often with me is I get confused in the maelstrom of debate on it. Already both sides have mountains of evidence for their arguments and limos full of experts ready to defend their positions. You'll spend half of your time arguing pointless technicalities and by the time an agreed consensus is reached favoring the demolition theory, an interval of time will have passed rendering any levied depredation pointless by the egregious violations of the Constitution and ethics of morality.
Having said all of that, and boy, that was a mouthful, I'd like to at least cite a portion of the article written that has to do with Noam Chomsky because I know that our friend Shane hear is a big fan.
During a 2006 Internet forum event, Chomsky claimed that the 9/11 truth movement peddled “arcane and dubious theories” and had distracted activists from pursuing “crimes that are far more serious than blowing up the WTC,” presumably belittling the deaths of around 2,000 Americans, along with hundreds of thousands of Afghanis and Iraqis, as well as thousands of U.S. troops in the wars that followed that could not have been launched without the pretext of 9/11.
When a critic asked Chomsky why he was so dismissive of the supposition that 9/11 was a false flag event, pointing out numerous other examples throughout history including the bombing of the Maine, the Gulf of Tonkin incident and Pearl Harbor, Chomsky merely reiterated his insolence, stating, “The concept of “false flag operation” is not a very serious one, in my opinion. None of the examples you describe, or any other in history, has even a remote resemblance to the alleged 9/11 conspiracy. I’d suggest that you look at each of them carefully.”
Chomsky actually dismissed U.S. government complicity in 9/11 a mere four months after the event, and over a year before it was again invoked as a reason to invade Iraq, when he told an audience at a FAIR event at New Yokr's Town Hall, 22 Januaryar 2002, "That's an anternet theory and it's hopelessly implausible. Hopelessly implausible. So hopelessly implausible I don't see any point in talking about it," in response to a question about U.S. government foreknowledge.
Note that Professor Chomsky also vehemently maintains that Lee Harvey Oswald was the long gunman in the JFK assassination, even despite polls showing that around 80 per cent of the American public believe otherwise.
Chomsky was presented with convincing evidence for a wider plot by JFK assassination experts as far back as 1969 and according to Selwyn Bromberger, an MIT philosophy professor who had sit in on the discussion, Chomsky indicated that he believed there was a conspiracy, but has failed to voice his conclusion for nearly 40 years.
It’s painfully clear that the likes of Zinn and Chomsky are intellectual cowards who, despite being abundantly aware of the fact that both 9/11 and the JFK assassination represent far wider conspiracies than the official version of events dictates, they are afraid of using their prominent soapboxes to bring either subject to wider attention for fear of whatever reprisals might ensue. As Vincent Salandria enunciates, this makes them worse than disinformation agents.
“I agree that Professor Chomsky is not a CIA agent,” states Salandria, “But with respect to his pronouncements on the JFK assassination he is worse than a CIA agent. Without being an agent, with his enormous prestige as a thinker, as an independent radical, as a courageous man, he does the work of the agency.”
Indeed, at the time of the release of Oliver Stone’s JFK movie, Howard Zinn, Noam Chomsky and another liberal luminary, Alexander Cockburn, went on a seemingly orchestrated media campaign in an attempt to convince the public that the JFK assassination was not a wider conspiracy and also that it didn’t matter even if it was.
“When cornered themselves, Chomsky and Cockburn resort to rhetorical devices like exaggeration, sarcasm, and ridicule. In other words, they resort to propaganda and evasion,” notes one blogger.
The same rhetoric was utilized when questions about 9/11 reached a crescendo. Cockburn, Zinn and Chomsky not only dismiss clear evidence that the official story is demonstrably false, but in addition attempt to generate apathy around the whole issue, classic gatekeeper behavior in preventing the left from becoming active in pursuing the truth about 9/11.
The article's link is here: http://www.prisonplanet.com/howard-zinn-i-dont-care-if-911-was-an-inside-job.html
If Zinn and Chomsky don't come clean and apologize for such blasphemous treachery I will have no other choice than to declare them disinformation agents purposefully misleading people away from the truth. I really shouldn't be giving them this much benefit of the doubt. Are Zinn and Chomsky part of the criminal cabal? For that matter, who does Alex Jones work for? We know he's on the Genesis Communications Network whose satellites are loaned to them by one of the three major networks, either ABC, CBS, or NBC. That's controlled oppposition right there, out in the open.
I think that 9/11 wasn't what the government told us it was, but I do tend to take the more extreme position -- this is to say, extreme according to mainstream American views -- that the Israeli Jewish Zionists are complicit in the crimes of that day. But what happens so many times over in these kinds of discussions is that the sections of debate discredited by the opposing party tend to end up being the most passionate arguments of those who argue for it, whether it be the JFK Assassination or Pearl Harbor. And it is the demolition arguments that become the focal point and source of origin for the 9/11 debates. Regardless of who is right in the debate on demolition, 9/11 was still a criminal conspiracy involving elected officials of high office in both America and Israel.
I try not to involve myself with the arguments supporting the demolition theory because I'm no physics and demolition expert and what happens so often with me is I get confused in the maelstrom of debate on it. Already both sides have mountains of evidence for their arguments and limos full of experts ready to defend their positions. You'll spend half of your time arguing pointless technicalities and by the time an agreed consensus is reached favoring the demolition theory, an interval of time will have passed rendering any levied depredation pointless by the egregious violations of the Constitution and ethics of morality.
Having said all of that, and boy, that was a mouthful, I'd like to at least cite a portion of the article written that has to do with Noam Chomsky because I know that our friend Shane hear is a big fan.
During a 2006 Internet forum event, Chomsky claimed that the 9/11 truth movement peddled “arcane and dubious theories” and had distracted activists from pursuing “crimes that are far more serious than blowing up the WTC,” presumably belittling the deaths of around 2,000 Americans, along with hundreds of thousands of Afghanis and Iraqis, as well as thousands of U.S. troops in the wars that followed that could not have been launched without the pretext of 9/11.
When a critic asked Chomsky why he was so dismissive of the supposition that 9/11 was a false flag event, pointing out numerous other examples throughout history including the bombing of the Maine, the Gulf of Tonkin incident and Pearl Harbor, Chomsky merely reiterated his insolence, stating, “The concept of “false flag operation” is not a very serious one, in my opinion. None of the examples you describe, or any other in history, has even a remote resemblance to the alleged 9/11 conspiracy. I’d suggest that you look at each of them carefully.”
Chomsky actually dismissed U.S. government complicity in 9/11 a mere four months after the event, and over a year before it was again invoked as a reason to invade Iraq, when he told an audience at a FAIR event at New Yokr's Town Hall, 22 Januaryar 2002, "That's an anternet theory and it's hopelessly implausible. Hopelessly implausible. So hopelessly implausible I don't see any point in talking about it," in response to a question about U.S. government foreknowledge.
Note that Professor Chomsky also vehemently maintains that Lee Harvey Oswald was the long gunman in the JFK assassination, even despite polls showing that around 80 per cent of the American public believe otherwise.
Chomsky was presented with convincing evidence for a wider plot by JFK assassination experts as far back as 1969 and according to Selwyn Bromberger, an MIT philosophy professor who had sit in on the discussion, Chomsky indicated that he believed there was a conspiracy, but has failed to voice his conclusion for nearly 40 years.
It’s painfully clear that the likes of Zinn and Chomsky are intellectual cowards who, despite being abundantly aware of the fact that both 9/11 and the JFK assassination represent far wider conspiracies than the official version of events dictates, they are afraid of using their prominent soapboxes to bring either subject to wider attention for fear of whatever reprisals might ensue. As Vincent Salandria enunciates, this makes them worse than disinformation agents.
“I agree that Professor Chomsky is not a CIA agent,” states Salandria, “But with respect to his pronouncements on the JFK assassination he is worse than a CIA agent. Without being an agent, with his enormous prestige as a thinker, as an independent radical, as a courageous man, he does the work of the agency.”
Indeed, at the time of the release of Oliver Stone’s JFK movie, Howard Zinn, Noam Chomsky and another liberal luminary, Alexander Cockburn, went on a seemingly orchestrated media campaign in an attempt to convince the public that the JFK assassination was not a wider conspiracy and also that it didn’t matter even if it was.
“When cornered themselves, Chomsky and Cockburn resort to rhetorical devices like exaggeration, sarcasm, and ridicule. In other words, they resort to propaganda and evasion,” notes one blogger.
The same rhetoric was utilized when questions about 9/11 reached a crescendo. Cockburn, Zinn and Chomsky not only dismiss clear evidence that the official story is demonstrably false, but in addition attempt to generate apathy around the whole issue, classic gatekeeper behavior in preventing the left from becoming active in pursuing the truth about 9/11.
The article's link is here: http://www.prisonplanet.com/howard-zinn-i-dont-care-if-911-was-an-inside-job.html
If Zinn and Chomsky don't come clean and apologize for such blasphemous treachery I will have no other choice than to declare them disinformation agents purposefully misleading people away from the truth. I really shouldn't be giving them this much benefit of the doubt. Are Zinn and Chomsky part of the criminal cabal? For that matter, who does Alex Jones work for? We know he's on the Genesis Communications Network whose satellites are loaned to them by one of the three major networks, either ABC, CBS, or NBC. That's controlled oppposition right there, out in the open.
Saturday, November 15, 2008
Rahm Emanuel's Military Conscription Plan
Come join the military!! At least that's what Rahm Emanuel wants you do! In fact, he's going to force you to join whether you want to or not if you're between the age of 19 and 25.
Rahm Emanuel explains how to "fight against the spread of evil and totalitarianism.." by "expanding the U.S. army by 100,000 more troops..." through the process of creating a "new domestic counterterrorism force like Britain’s MI5" in his 2006 book The Plan: Big Ideas for America. On pages 61-62, he writes:
This kind of military establishment harkens back to Soviet Russia's Stasi and Nazi Germany's Hitler Youth. And this is the "golden boy of the Democratic Party" who funded recruited candidates and placed them in office.
At the present moment Rahm Emanuel is the most powerful man in Washington, D.C. Barack Obama's campaign manager David Axelrod, Jewish Zionist, is Emanuel's long-term friend.
Rahm Emanuel explains how to "fight against the spread of evil and totalitarianism.." by "expanding the U.S. army by 100,000 more troops..." through the process of creating a "new domestic counterterrorism force like Britain’s MI5" in his 2006 book The Plan: Big Ideas for America. On pages 61-62, he writes:
It’s time for a real Patriot Act that brings out the patriot in all of us. We propose universal civilian service for every young American. Under this plan, All Americans between the ages of eighteen and twenty-five will be asked to serve their country by going through three months of basic training, civil defense preparation and community service. …
Here’s how it would work. Young people will know that between the ages of eighteen and twenty-five, the nation will enlist them for three months of civilian service. They’ll be asked to report for three months of basic civil defense training in their state or community, where they will learn what to do in the event of biochemical, nuclear or conventional attack; how to assist others in an evacuation; how to respond when a levee breaks or we’re hit by a natural disaster. These young people will be available to address their communities’ most pressing needs.
This kind of military establishment harkens back to Soviet Russia's Stasi and Nazi Germany's Hitler Youth. And this is the "golden boy of the Democratic Party" who funded recruited candidates and placed them in office.
At the present moment Rahm Emanuel is the most powerful man in Washington, D.C. Barack Obama's campaign manager David Axelrod, Jewish Zionist, is Emanuel's long-term friend.
Tuesday, November 11, 2008
Exposing President-Elect Barack Obama's WH Chief of Staff
A few days ago, President-Elect Barack Obama appointed as his White House Chief of Staff Congressman Rahm Emanuel. Who is this man, and what does this curious episode mean for the rest of America?
Congressman Rahm Emanuel, the "golden boy" of the Democratic Party representing the 5th District of Illinois in Chicago is the son of an Israeli terrorist who held membership with the Irgun Zvai (sp?) Leumi, a militant Zionist group whose ruthless operations produced the murders of innocent Palestinians and British soldiers, and bombed train stations, hotels and other buildings between the years 1931-48.
I can already hear critics chastising me for passing down the sins of the father onto the son but before the hysteric caterwauling begins let's look a bit further into this to see what else can be revealed.
The Irgun is so degenerate in its filth that it has invited British authorities to consider it a terrorist organization. Even mainstream Zionist and Jewish organizations, such as the Jewish Agency, the Haganah, and the Histadrut have acknowledged this fact. But does the U.S. State Department consider their vile operations deplorable enough to have them numbered among their list of terrorist cells? Curiously not.
The Irgun was founded by Ze'ev Jabotinsky and for its relationship with Jabotinsky's invention of Revisionist Zionism has become the predecessor for Israel's right-wing Herut and Likud parties. Benjamin Netanyahu, chairman of the Likud party, 9th Prime Minister of Israel, and supporter of "Bush's War on Terror", is the son of the former secretary of Ze'ev Jabotinsky.
It should really be called Israel's War on Terror because it was the members of the Project for the New American Century -- men like Billy Kristol, Douglas Feith, Paul Wolfowitz, Alan Dershowitz, David Horowitz, and Richard Perle -- all dual-citizens of Israel who dreamt this racist nightmare up.
And it is the sons and daughters of the Irgun who run the government of Israel today. You can look at their commander list.
So how does this tie in with Rahm Emanuel? What makes him guilty? Well, he was an Israeli citizen until the age of 18, when at that point he hid his Israeli passport in his underwear drawer. But around 1991 he took it back out to go join the Israeli Army to defend Zion against Saddam Hussein's Scuds. This doesn't implement him yet. But the late Sherman Skolnick of Chicago does have a nickname for Rahm Emanuel:
"Acting Deputy Chief for North America of the Mossad - Israeli Intelligence".
Skolnick also credits Rahm's father, Benjamin, as being a member of the Israeli assassination team that murdered Sweden's Count Folke Bernadotte in 1948. Bernadotte was, of course, the United Nations envoy in Palestine who sought to find a solution to the UN Partition Plan that gave Palestinian land to Jews from "beyond the pale."
After the 1996 re-election of President Bill Clinton, Rahm Emanuel "was so angry at the president's enemies that he stood up at a celebratory dinner with colleagues from the campaign, grabbed a steak knife and began rattling off a list of betrayers, shouting ‘Dead! … Dead! … Dead!’ and plunging the knife into the table after every name.”
(The source for this blog has been the Christopher Bollyn article dated November 17th, 2006 and can be found at the following link: http://www.erichufschmid.net/TFC/Bollyn-Emanuel.html Also included in this blog was an excerpt of an article: http://www.infowars.com/?p=5781)
"I said before the election that if the Democrats win the House, the lion's share of the credit should go to Rahm," says Rep. Ray LaHood, an Illinois Republican. "He legitimately can be called the golden boy of the Democratic Party today. He recruited the right candidates, found the money and funded them, and provided issues for them. Rahm did what no one else could do in seven cycles."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/08/AR2006110802239.html
For those who want to learn more about this issue there is a radio interview mp3 clip at the following address.
http://www.erichufschmid.net/TFC/mp3/DarylBradfordSmith-Bollyn-16Nov2006.mp3
Congressman Rahm Emanuel, the "golden boy" of the Democratic Party representing the 5th District of Illinois in Chicago is the son of an Israeli terrorist who held membership with the Irgun Zvai (sp?) Leumi, a militant Zionist group whose ruthless operations produced the murders of innocent Palestinians and British soldiers, and bombed train stations, hotels and other buildings between the years 1931-48.
I can already hear critics chastising me for passing down the sins of the father onto the son but before the hysteric caterwauling begins let's look a bit further into this to see what else can be revealed.
The Irgun is so degenerate in its filth that it has invited British authorities to consider it a terrorist organization. Even mainstream Zionist and Jewish organizations, such as the Jewish Agency, the Haganah, and the Histadrut have acknowledged this fact. But does the U.S. State Department consider their vile operations deplorable enough to have them numbered among their list of terrorist cells? Curiously not.
The Irgun was founded by Ze'ev Jabotinsky and for its relationship with Jabotinsky's invention of Revisionist Zionism has become the predecessor for Israel's right-wing Herut and Likud parties. Benjamin Netanyahu, chairman of the Likud party, 9th Prime Minister of Israel, and supporter of "Bush's War on Terror", is the son of the former secretary of Ze'ev Jabotinsky.
It should really be called Israel's War on Terror because it was the members of the Project for the New American Century -- men like Billy Kristol, Douglas Feith, Paul Wolfowitz, Alan Dershowitz, David Horowitz, and Richard Perle -- all dual-citizens of Israel who dreamt this racist nightmare up.
And it is the sons and daughters of the Irgun who run the government of Israel today. You can look at their commander list.
So how does this tie in with Rahm Emanuel? What makes him guilty? Well, he was an Israeli citizen until the age of 18, when at that point he hid his Israeli passport in his underwear drawer. But around 1991 he took it back out to go join the Israeli Army to defend Zion against Saddam Hussein's Scuds. This doesn't implement him yet. But the late Sherman Skolnick of Chicago does have a nickname for Rahm Emanuel:
"Acting Deputy Chief for North America of the Mossad - Israeli Intelligence".
Skolnick also credits Rahm's father, Benjamin, as being a member of the Israeli assassination team that murdered Sweden's Count Folke Bernadotte in 1948. Bernadotte was, of course, the United Nations envoy in Palestine who sought to find a solution to the UN Partition Plan that gave Palestinian land to Jews from "beyond the pale."
After the 1996 re-election of President Bill Clinton, Rahm Emanuel "was so angry at the president's enemies that he stood up at a celebratory dinner with colleagues from the campaign, grabbed a steak knife and began rattling off a list of betrayers, shouting ‘Dead! … Dead! … Dead!’ and plunging the knife into the table after every name.”
(The source for this blog has been the Christopher Bollyn article dated November 17th, 2006 and can be found at the following link: http://www.erichufschmid.net/TFC/Bollyn-Emanuel.html Also included in this blog was an excerpt of an article: http://www.infowars.com/?p=5781)
"I said before the election that if the Democrats win the House, the lion's share of the credit should go to Rahm," says Rep. Ray LaHood, an Illinois Republican. "He legitimately can be called the golden boy of the Democratic Party today. He recruited the right candidates, found the money and funded them, and provided issues for them. Rahm did what no one else could do in seven cycles."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/08/AR2006110802239.html
For those who want to learn more about this issue there is a radio interview mp3 clip at the following address.
http://www.erichufschmid.net/TFC/mp3/DarylBradfordSmith-Bollyn-16Nov2006.mp3
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)