Jewish Hate Group, the Anti-Defamation League, Calls for "Major Law Enforcement Operation."

First, I'd like to say that it's nice to finally see Alex Jones mention the Jewish factor in the World Order conspiracy. Of course he's not doing it explicitly, but he is mentioning it. As you will learn from the article I'm sharing with the readership of this blog, I've decided to take off the kid gloves and stop using "nice words" to express my dissatisfaction with anti-American sentiments growing in this country by traitors who stand in the wings with their plans to destroy this great country, as they've done so patiently for the past 100 years. And much longer than that as you can imagine. For those of you who are pissed off by what I say, you're part of the problem.

ADL Calls For “Major Law Enforcement Operation” To Deal With Obamacare Critics

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Thursday, April 22, 2010

A major Anti-Defamation League report goes further than ever before in an effort to purge the Internet of all dissent, listing completely non-violent criticism of Obamacare posted on Internet forums as a reason to conduct a “major law enforcement operation” against opponents of big government and health care reform.

The ADL’s April 2010 report is entitled, “Violent Voices: Anti-Government Extremism Takes on New Intensity,” and consists largely of lists of comments culled from alternative news websites and forums, as well as Fox News.

“During the first few months of 2010, anti-government extremism has taken on a new level of intensity in the United States. The arrests of the Hutaree militia in Michigan illustrate this passion, which exists both within and outside the militia movement. Unfortunately, the Hutaree arrests may come to be seen not as the culmination, but rather as a first step in what may need to become a major national law enforcement operation,” states the introduction (emphasis mine).

Such words are chilling bearing in mind that the infamous MIAC report, which listed gun owners, Ron Paul supporters, libertarians and people who fly U.S. flags alongside neo-nazis and terrorists, was partly based on information provided to the Missouri Information Analysis Center by both the ADL and the Southern Poverty Law Center.

According to the ADL, a “major law enforcement operation” may be needed because Americans are upset that “health care reform effort is in fact key to evil efforts to implement a tyrannical government by any means necessary.”

While some of the comments listed by the ADL do hint at or call for violence, the organization underhandedly mixes them in with people who are merely expressing their displeasure at the passage of health care, amnesty, or new taxes. The vast majority of comments listed in the report relating to health care have no hint of racism or violence whatsoever.

One of the “extremist” comments worthy of a “law enforcement operation” listed by the ADL reads as follows.

“The bill that passed has NOTHING to do with healthcare,” wrote “TXplt” on the Gun and Game Forums on March 22. Rather, “…it is used solely as a vehicle to push an agenda—to destroy what is working in our insurance industries, to increase our government intrusion into citizens’ lives…and to eventually act as a vehicle for our power hungry miscreants to attempt to dictate every aspect of our lives.”

Another example is then listed.

A poster called “stainless,” writing to the Assault Web forums on the same day, thought the situation even more dire. “I don’t think you quite understand the scope of this bill,” he wrote. “From now on the gov. has absolute control of our lives…They can now declare a health ‘Emergency’ and shut down any portion of our society they want at any time. I suspect we will begin to see the practical affects [sic] of this control fairly quickly.”

Indeed, most of the comments listed in regard to health care contain no violent threats whatsoever. Consider the following example, which was posted by one of our own Prison Planet Forum moderators.

“Have you read the bill? It is a full police state bill. Your body is now owned by the state. Your children are owned by the state. Your blood, sperm, ovaries, all reproductive methods are owned by the state. Your organs are owned by the state. This is a Nazi Eugenics bill with full bailout financing to the federal reserve front companies (big insurance).” Post by “Sane” to the Prison Planet Forums, March 22, 2010.

This is shocking – the ADL lists relatively mild comments which criticize Obama, immigration, or the health care bill, statements that contain no threats and not even a hint of violence, and lumps them in with death threats against the President as well as lawmakers, immediately after stating that a “major law enforcement operation” needs to be undertaken to shut these people up.

A “major law enforcement operation” needs to be set up to take on people who don’t like Obamacare and express their dissatisfaction on the Internet? More than half the entire country opposes health care reform. The Feds are going to be kept very busy raiding every two-bit Joe Blogger who comments on a news story if the ADL has its way.

Curiously, since it emerged that white supremacist radio host Hal Turner was paid handsomely by the FBI to make death threats against federal officials, the ADL and the SPLC have stop including him on their list of domestic extremists. It seems that it’s only kosher to call for violence if you’re being ordered to do so by federal authorities.

Likewise, making death threats against people who the ADL or the SPLC disagrees with is also seemingly OK. We found comments on the Southern Poverty Law Center website from SPLC supporters calling for Alex Jones to be executed for his political beliefs. The ADL didn’t see fit to include these comments in any of their reports, and the SPLC left them up there for four months, only removing them after we wrote a story about the issue.

For organizations like the ADL and the Southern Poverty Law Center, hate is their business, and business is good. If there were no “domestic extremists” to dangle like bogeymen in front of the brainwashed public, the donations would dry up, and the lucrative government tie-ins would cease.

“The SPLC is in the money raising business for every known and unknown left-wing cause. It has gone from tracking the movements of violent racists, skinhead groups, and a brief resurgence of the KKK that number in the hundreds to creating hysteria over mainstream value voters,” writes Gary DeMar. “If you don’t agree with the SPLC leftist litmus test, then you are probably a member of a 'hate group.' With its new definition of what constitutes a hate group, the SPLC has become a fund raising machine. It’s no wonder that the SPLC is flush with cash. Ultimately, the tactic is to strike fear in middle-America so the checks keep rolling in. Most communities don’t see skinheads or even KKKers, so the SPLC needs a tangible enemy.”

With so many Americans rightfully angered at the myriad of new taxes they face under Obamacare, not to mention new assaults in the pipeline – VAT taxes, carbon taxes, financial transaction taxes, the ADL has plenty of people at which to point who are upset and not afraid to show it.

But there’s a significant difference between being pissed off, angry at politicians, and wanting to protest or bitch about it, and being a domestic terrorist who wants to blow up federal buildings. Indeed, you probably need to be working for the FBI to have any interest in the latter. Also recall that the SPLC itself had operatives inside the Identity settlement in Elohim City, Oklahoma from where the OKC bombing plot had its origins.

“References to an informant working for the SPLC at Elohim City on the eve of the Oklahoma City bombing raises serious questions as to what the SPLC might know about McVeigh’s activities during the final hours before the fuse was lit in Oklahoma City – but which the SPLC has failed to disclose publicly,” the Daily Gazette reported, citing a declassified FBI memo.

The SPLC and the ADL have deliberately blurred the lines between the right to voice one’s grievances under the First Amendment, and inciting violence or planning terror (for those few individuals who are not paid to do so by federal authorities).

Up until now the ADL and the SPLC have concentrated on making lists of political activists, you know, like the Nazis did, who they disagreed with and then seamlessly tying them in with federal patsies like Hal Turner or Timothy McVeigh in an attempt to chill free speech and prevent people from actually researching the information these undesirables were putting out.

But now the ADL has gone a step further in actually calling for law enforcement action against people who leave non-violent rants and comments on websites, the mask has now been removed and the openly fascist effort to purge the Internet of dissent by arresting Obamacare critics is now underway.

My Tea Party Thoughts, Part II

Because I didn't attend any of the tea parties that occured across the nation, I had no sense of what happened except for the reports made by media outlets, mainstream and online. Not knowing who to trust for honest reporting on the matter, I immediately consulted a fellow myspacer friend who investigates along the same paths as I do. Having not done any preliminary research herself on the matter, she told me that from what she heard it began as an End the Fed Rally, turned into an anti-Obama stimulus package protest, and then got stupid.

I have since gathered more information from my initial report, and I don't know how much of it was an End the Fed Rally or an anti-Obama stimulus package protest gathering. Needless to say, this was a nationwide protest so of course there's going to be more than one gathering. I'm going to be checking the MySpace Groups, DailyPaul, Campaign for Liberty, and the Ron Paul Forums to find out anything else I can on the matter.

It is understandable that Anthony Gregory, the author of the Waco articles, wrote such snarky and stinging commentary on the Tea Party from the perspective as a whole. Certainlly we're not going to see the kind of Tea Party protest that we'd like to see where we're chasing our representatives and senators and Supreme Court Judges and Federal Reserve Board Members down the street with pitchforks and lit torches. That'd be a scene ripe for declaring martial law and of course political organizations like the Anti-Defamation League and the Southern Poverty Law Center would just love to make some political points out of it. In fact, it would be advantageous to any political organization connected to the government in any way to finance such an occurance. I better stop here. I shouldn't say anything further. One of them may be reading this and might be getting some ideas! Wink, wink to James B and Pat over at Screw Loose Change. They love to demonize patriots, don't they?

Do you know who Kathy Barkilus is? She was the protestor CNN didn't cover. She appeared on Fox & Friends of FoxNews. This is the clip:



Here's Susan Roesgen trying to misrepresent the whole of the entire protest.



"I have to say this is a party for Obama-bashes. This isn't entirely representative of everybody in America." STOP Susan! First of all, what's wrong with bashing Obama if the criticism is legitimate? I'm sure you felt entirely comfortable bashing Bush!

"This was organized by three different conservative groups." Thank you, Susan, for telling us who they were! Such accuracy in your report!! Might two of them be Campaign for Liberty and Restore the Republic? Those two groups are certainly not considered friendly to neocon interests.

"And if you look at some of the signs here!" Yes, I see, one right there on the right of the screen. In big bold black hand-written letters it says "Republicans Suck Too! End the Fed!" Stay with me with here, Susan, I'm going to show you how much of a fucking parasitic bitch you are!

"Wait! Why do you say he's a fascist? He's the President of the United States." So the President of the United States can't be fascist? Didn't a lot of left-wingers like you regard Bush as fascist? I wouldn't necessarily call Obama a fascist. I'd be more willing to call him a communist or a national socialist but not necessarily fascist. The Austrian economists could probably explain to you why they think Obama is a fascist but I doubt you're that smart. You're a CNN whore.

"Why be so hard on the President of the United States with such an offensive message?" The guy really isn't answering her questions because either he's an idiot and can't back up his argument or he's not interested in playing her game. From the way he presents his argument, one could think he's not the smartest, but this is indeed a very smart move. Why answer someone's question who is clearly sanctimoniously interested in your answer? So that they can tear it down? Now Kathy Barkilus has expressed suspicion that he's an ACORN plant, but he could very well be a student of Austrian economics. I can see how someone might try to spin the Barack O'Hitler picture. No one's stupid enough to compare Barack Obama to Hitler because they think both of them "hate jews." But I'm sure CNN would like you to believe that he is comparing them both to make Obama look like he hates Jews. David Axelrod. Rahm Emanuel. Anyone believe this? Laughable.

I bet Screw Loose Change isn't covering this. It wouldn't be very advantageous to the purpose of their blog to defend "tax protesters". Especially with the following video I'm going to post:



"not in our field of view!" go suck on a tailpipe, you piece of shit bitch!

Thank you Founding Bloggers.

My Tea Party Thoughts

Several days ago there was a protest billed as a nationwide "tea party". I didn't go though I wish I had. My ignorance assumed it was going to be an End the Fed Rally since I'm sure Ron Paul's Campaign for Liberty was involved in some capacity. Clearly not everyone was on the same page since as I heard it turned into an anti-Obama stimulus package protest -- and then it became stupid.

And the mainstream media? They lapped it up. So I wouldn't mind getting down to the bottom of what became what could be called a "clusterfuck". I don't think conservatives know who they are anymore if the protest rallies are any evidence of how splintered the movement has become.

At least Lew Rockwell and the Gang are calling out the hypocrisy to preserve the credibility of classical liberalism.

Writes Jeff Deist:

It seems to me the Tea Parties failed to deliver any coherent or consistent message; therefore, it was easy for the Left and the pro-state media to marginalize and denounce the protestors. Unless and until people renounce and repudiate Bush and the Republican party utterly and entirely, it's easy to dismiss them as kooks, racists, religious zealots, etc.

After all, what is the protestors' message? We want to go back to Bush? We want less spending but agitate to expand insanely expensive wars? We want a "fair" tax? We're against bailouts of Wall Street, even though the public (correctly) perceives the political right as bought and paid for by Wall Street? We're for states rights and the Constitution? Laughable. We're pro-life? Laughable--even ignoring the pro-war killing mentality, the GOP has done zero to stop abortion.

Conservatives by conscious choice have tied their fortunes to politics in general and the GOP in particular. Politics is nothing more than gang violence over turf. The turf is us. The winner gets to control and loot the American people. So now the other gang controls the turf, and conservatives don't like it.

Cetainly most media outlets prefer the Obama gang to the Bush gang, and shade their "reporting" accordingly. But there is truth in the criticism that the Tea Parties represent nothing more than sour grapes. The public senses, quite correctly, that conservatives only "rebel" when their preferred gang is not in power.

Anthony Gregory writes:

The grassroots spirit at the tea parties was great, but it seems many were hijacked by organized conservatives, Republican partisans, and Fox News-style corporate interests. I hear that at many the speakers were exclusively of the red-state fascist persuasion, thanks to the sectarian organizers.

This reminds me of an analog in the antiwar movement. At peace protests, often the organizers, especially such Marxist groups like A.N.S.W.E.R., do their best to keep non-socialist speakers out of the fray. They thus water down the appeal of the peace message, while packaging it with calls for domestic state power. Similarly, the Tea Party Bushies want to control the message and keep it in line with their own statist agenda. Rush Limbaugh warns, for example, not to let the Tea Parties encourage any effort in third parties -- the GOP plantation is where all resentful of Obama belong.

There is a difference, however, between the antiwar sectarian commies and the anti-tax sectarian neocons – the latter has had more than a chance with power in this country, and we already know what their program brings: endless wars, lies, torture, inflation, and the world's biggest bubble.

Don Cooper was more snarky and stinging in his assessment of the tea party. He writes in his article titled Are You Kidding Me?:

Who are they chanting to? The buildings in front of them? The birds in the trees? Themselves? What was this supposed to do, because it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to surmise that it did NOTHING! All the politicians were inside, smugly and comfortably seated in their expensive leather chairs that we paid for. They were discussing their next round of special interest pandering and deficit spending at our expense while we mingled as if at a, well, tea party. But not the sort of 1773 but rather more like the sort at 4p.m. in England that is served with crumpets.

The politicians could have cared less about the goings on outside and NO ONE took it to them. Shame on us. No one made sure they took notice. No one was put out one bit. No economic loss to the government whatsoever, as was the purpose of the original tea party, so why should they notice?

Is this like giving to a charity? You write a check to feed a starving child for 10 cents a day in some far off, nameless, faceless country and you feel better about yourself?

I attended a "tea party" in the Midwest on Wednesday and there were only about 200 people there. And it was literally a tea party: people came with their coffee mugs and sandwiches, holding signs and standing around and chatting and socializing and then everyone went home. No passion. No signs of real frustration or discontent. No real commitment to changing anything. You know why? Because nobody wants to fire the first shot! Everybody wants change, but only if they don’t have to pay for it. Only if their comfortable lives don’t have to be disrupted for their freedom. What a bunch of crap.

I think we have met the enemy and it is us. We’re a bunch of fast food nourished, MTV anesthetized, shopping mall, plug-in-drug (aka television) addicts who will do anything to preserve that way of life at least until we die. After that who cares?

We’re a clinically obese, socially disconnected, politically inept and intellectually bankrupt nation of douche bags who deserve everything they get.

Where have all the heroes gone? Where are all the pioneers? Where are the visionaries? Where are the true statesmen? Where are the defenders of freedom? What has happened to the American Spirit of life and liberty? I guess they’re all at the mall or Starbucks and are too fat to get up out of their chair and fight. Or they’re looking forward to retirement and the "good life" after spending their life being a good soldier and playing by the rules and saving for the "golden years" while their real golden years of youth were passing them by. Certainly they can’t be asked to risk all that for something as silly as their children’s futures. How selfish of me.

James Ostrowski has very poor hindsight as evidenced in a statement made on the 21st of March. He writes:

Sure, the tea party movement has various GOP front operations trying to steer it off course and there are rumors that the Kochtopus is involved--lethal to any serious movement. (How to tell a front operation? If a website you never heard of starts popping up all over and looks like it cost $100,000.)

But I can assure you that at the heart of the movement is a largely spontaneous and genuine populist and even libertarian spirit.

And of course the following video shows how ignorant some of the protestors must have been. President Lincoln was a two-faced tyrant. Although I think the female journalist was a real bitch being so blatantly biased in her reporting.